![]() Thus, according to the data, reciting the abc's backwards presents a significant distraction, while reading the abc's backwards presents a small and insignificant distraction. The test involving reading the abc's barely showed an increase in reaction time, when compared to the control test. However, only the test involving reciting the abc's showed a clear and significant increase in time. We predicted that both experimental cases would show a increase in reaction time. Another person could be added to verify when gathering results, to reduce the aforementioned errors with the measuring tool. The location of the test could affect reaction time, as a busy classroom could be distracting. ![]() Our method could be improved by specifying conditions to meet a perfect testing environment. However, by testing a larger population, you can reduce the range of the error bars and lessen the effect of such outliers. These are almost impossible to fix, as each person has a different situation. Outliers can occur from people who don't get distracted as easily, people who have a harder time dealing with more than one task, people in poor condition. These are generally hard to correct and usually don't pose a major problem. The measuring tool can vary, whether it be a printing error on the meter stick or human error in observing and recording the data from the measuring tool. Many factors, in general, can affect the reliability of the experiment, and widen the error bars. Because of the range of error, this means that reading the abc's or reciting the abc's could have either a small or a drastic effect on reaction time, when compared to the undistracted trial. Due to this, the data may actually have an even wider gap between the control and experimental tests, or little to no difference between them. Given the standard deviation of the data set and the resulting error bars, the true reactions times could vary widely. However, reading the abc's should have shown a larger increase in reaction time, because it still is a harder task than being completely undistracted. We believe reciting the abc's is a harder task than reading, and thus shows a larger increase in reaction time. But, when reading the abc's, there is little difference in reaction time. By itself, the bars show a clear and significant difference between the control test and reciting the abc's. Authored by: NL According to our data, on average, the reaction time was slower when reciting the abc's, but not when reading them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |